In Response To…

In Response to…Robert Weide

The opinions expressed in this Daily Beast piece by Robert Weide are the kind that allow sexual abuse to run so rampant.

His main point is, “look, I know the guy, and he’s a nice guy.” He also fills his piece with a lot of bluffs and fillers, such as a lengthy bit where he argues the issue about Soon-yi against a strawman so he can appear to be an informed guy, or asides like mentioning the fact that Woody Allen was claustrophobic so “how could he have stepped into an attic?” Compare the lengths to which he goes to rationalize his opinions (written before the Dylan Farrow letter, but he stands by it proudly) to Dylan Farrow’s plain-stated fact: it happened.

This is how abusers get away with it: people think their way around in circles to try to figure out every possible way that it could have not happened. Because if it did happen, that means they know like/love a monster. That makes them monstrous by association, which is something that doesn’t make any sense. Their world is filled with nice people, no monsters. They cannot, or refuse to, reconcile that these normal people they know are responsible for moral atrocities.

So, in the face of a simple utterance, “it happened,” people with the poisoned mindset of Robert Weide will start dragging in achievements and personality traits and family photos as if any of that means anything. There is such a wild misconception that we can spot abusers from miles away; that they’re slimy, unkempt, mouth-breathing, sweaty, that their eyes glaze over when they talk about their kids or their students or (etc). But their evil is a banal evil. They are the “average person,” they are the innocuous friends and family and teachers, and their niceness and achievements benefit them and cloak them. How else could they get so close and continue doing it?

Robert Weide is currently retweeting what he perceives as the worst of the insults leveled at him with a smug distanced air, because he’s the smart grown-up and everyone else is a little kid who doesn’t know any better. It’s this very individualistic warping of self — and of the powerful men in our lives, the invention of infallibility — that is a poison; one that hurts us all, no matter how much of it we ourselves partake in.


In Response To…Jared Leto’s Golden Globes Acceptance Speech

Jared Leto’s emphasis on how he transformed his body (You waxed your eyebrows, wow, good for you?) for his Dallas Buyers Club role as a trans person during his Oscar acceptance speech was irksome, especially in light of Laverne Cox’s elegant shutdown of Katie Couric’s invasive line of questioning. Couric hosted Cox, an actress on Orange Is The New Black, and Carmen Carrera, a model, for an episode of her daytime talk show, but only asked them questions about their transitioning processes. Couric’s focus on their “private parts” (Couric’s words) spurred Cox to school Couric on how transitioning should take a backseat to any number of trans issues that are far more serious and important than the status of a transgender’s genitals, such as violence, discrimination, and the high rate of homicide and unemployment among trans people. Cox tore down society’s toxic obsession with transition and transgender’s bodies while Leto just upheld it. This feels like a succinct summation of the problem with casting cisgendered, heterosexual actors to represent transgender roles, especially with an actually transgendered actress as talented as Cox on the scene. Let’s also consider this another reason why Jared Leto should just fall off the planet and leave us with only fond memories of him as Jordan Catalano.